Animal Spirits and the Indian economy
The phrase “Animal Spirits ‘appears occasionally in
think pieces by economists but there is never any explanation or definition
attached and most of us non economists view it as just another clever, emotive
phrase with no specific or formal implication.
In fact, however, the phrase describes a formal,
‘behavioral economics’ approach to economic problems and economists George
Akerlof and Robert Shiller have written the definitive book on the subject titled
‘Animal Spirits: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and why it Matters
for Global Capitalism.’
Taking a lead from John M Keynes, the authors argue
that economic decision making is not based on rational economic calculations
and motivations alone. A great deal of economic activity is dependent on
nonrational drivers which they define and give the label ’animal spirits.’
One conclusion from this acceptance of the existence
and significance of ‘animal spirits’ is that the theoretical conclusion that
free markets automatically determine the most optimal distribution of resources
, based on the assumption of economic rationality alone driving economic
behavior, is incorrect. In the real
world of ‘animal spirits’ Adam Smith’s ‘invisible hand’ will not ensure the
best of all possible economic worlds and there is need for careful monitoring
and regulation of the capitalist drive towards profit maximization. There have
to be carefully and clearly defined
rules and an efficient ‘referee who enforces them’. This is the role of
the state-to not only ‘give full rein to the creativity of capitalism’ but also
‘countervail the excesses that occur because of our animal spirits’.
The five different aspects of animal spirits that
impact economic decision making are a sense of confidence, of fairness, the
extent and degree of acceptance of corruption and bad faith, money illusion and
stories.
Confidence in our society , its institutions and the
future determine economic behavior and performance and is in turn impacted by
them .Our sense of fairness determines economic behavior especially that
relating to price setting and wage determination while corruption impacts
almost every economic decision. The inability to see through the effects of
inflation-the difference between nominal values and real values- has major
consequences for wage flexibility and investment decisions and finally the need
of the human mind to ‘think in terms of narratives, of sequences of events with
an internal logic and dynamic that appear as a unified whole’-in short the need
for ‘stories’ that in turn determine motivation-also impacts economic action.
The authors
examine several major economic phenomena to validate their theoretical
framework. Among these are the Depressions of the 1890s and the 1930s, the financial crisis in the
early 21st century engendered by the housing bubble and related invention of ‘exotic’ and toxic
derivatives, the consequences of the
infamous Enron corruption scandal and the enduring poverty of black people in
the US.
Their research leads the authors to conclude that animal spirits are indeed significant drivers
of economic decision making and must be taken into account for
understanding economic behavior and for formulating appropriate and effective economic policy.
In the Indian context the ‘theory’, if it can be so
labelled, of animal spirits seems prima facie to be singularly useful in
understanding economic events and behavior. Consider, for instance, the
apparently endless crisis enveloping the public sector banking system. These
banking entities have apparently disbursed enormous volumes of public funds in
their care to dubious investors, or more accurately, investors with dubious
intentions, who have defaulted on repayments and created a mountain-that
appears to be growing steadily- of non- performing assets. Given the extent of
the problem and that such banks are government owned and so cannot be allowed
to fail, government has pumped in large sums to ‘recapitalize’ these banks and
bring them back on their feet .The unanswered question of course is whether the
banks were simply incompetent on a massive scale or complicit in what was a set
of huge scam operations wherein large
sums of public moneys were misappropriated by clever fraudsters .More
importantly, what prevents the banks from repeating their past performance.
The I&LFS
story only serves to underline the problem of how corruption, bad faith and
sleepy and sloppy regulators can create an economic crisis of enormous
dimensions. Animal spirits are evidently real and significant and must be
factored in every attempt to understand the Indian economic reality.
We have witnessed a transformation of the Indian
economy since the growth spurt in the 1980s and the reforms-partial and gradual
though they were- of the 1990s.The strength of ‘free and open markets’ has been
amply demonstrated over the last thirty odd years. What we seem to have
forgotten, however, in the euphoria of high nominal and not- quite- so- high
real growth rates is the dark side of the force .The theory of Animal Spirits
reminds us to watch out for that very
real dark side and put in place strong -efficient and effective-regulatory
institutions.
As a natural reaction to the stifling economic
environment created by an incompetent, corrupt and bureaucratized state
dabbling in a strange version of socialism, we have now a swing towards
untrammeled ‘capitalism’. While it is true that the business of government is
not business, the state must not forget what its business really is- providing
the conditions necessary for positive animal spirits to function freely and
simultaneously regulating the more unruly and destructive manifestations of
such animal spirits.
A study of the Indian economic experience within the
framework provided by ‘Animal Spirits’ offers fascinating possibilities. What
for instance explains the Indian fascination for hoarding gold? Why are we so
reluctant to pay taxes and more generally why do we display little civic sense?
What makes us so vulnerable to ‘us versus them’ stories? Is it the lack of
confidence in the state engendered by a long and painful transition from a
feudal to a colonial dispensation both of which were characterized by an
extractive , exploitative and unjust state that did little towards alleviating
either absolute poverty or stark inequality? Is the continuation at the grass
roots - post Independence - of many colonial characteristics of the state
machinery responsible for a lack of confidence in the institutions of state and
related economic behavior?
A detailed study requires a larger canvas and a
different platform but suffice it to say that Animal Spirits are important and
their functioning in the Indian context merits study.
Very impressive but it's a long read :)
ReplyDeleteThanks and I absolutely agree.Will have to keep it shorter and crisper to retain reader attention.
DeleteAlso please leave your name so I know who I'm talking to.Regards
Doesn’t Adam Smith’s invisible hand still apply? All these behavioural economics add-ons are just more comprehensive descriptions of that, aren’t they? (I have no formal economics education but have never connected the discipline with purely rational decision making!)
ReplyDeleteI'm no economist but normal economic transactions in the marketplace do not consider externalities and any motive other than profit maximization so the invisible hand does not handle issues the authors raise-- animal spirits .This is what the authors say--mere profit maximization is not enough to understand economic behaviour.My two bits for what it is worth.
ReplyDeleteAlso do leave your name so I know whom I'm talking to .Regards
Well explained. India represents a major failure in evolving effective regulatory mechanisms and the continued micromanagement by the state. Economic illiberalism contributes greatly to political illiberalism, a point brought out long back by Hayek. I feel the Indian psyche still does not embrace the rule of law, whether in the economic or political spheres. We are witnessing its effects in India in an intensified form today.
ReplyDeleteA deep and thorough analysis, I myst say!
ReplyDelete