Sunday, November 15, 2020

Masters of Thriller Writing --- Jonathan Kellerman

 



Tales of crime fighting duos do not end with the adventures of Spencer and Hawk (See earlier blog post) or with those of Pike and Cole (see even earlier post). We also have Alex Delaware and Milo Sturgis solving murders in and around LA in a remarkable series of murder mysteries, the first of which was published in 1985 and the most recent in Feb.2020.

Alex is a psychologist -- specializing in child psychology -- who has taken early retirement from regular work and spends his time consulting occasionally, feeding his koi fish (a species of Japanese carp) in the pond in his Japanese garden and solving murders with his best friend Milo of the LAPD. Alex has a long-term relationship with his girlfriend, Robin, who makes – yes, with her hands – high-end guitars while Milo is openly gay and lives with his doctor partner, Rick. The police department looks askance at Milo’s sexual orientation and despite his stellar record in solving homicide cases, treats him badly in general.

None of this, however, gets in the way of Alex and Milo working together and catching murderers. The plots are often dark, but always compelling, and the pace relentless. Once you read one you more or less need to read them all -- they are that good.

The story does not end here. The author, Jonathan Kellerman has a  PhD in psychology, specializing in child psychology, and is a Professor at a medical college in, yes, California! Born in 1949, he published his first crime novel in 1985, having published medical stuff earlier. With the runaway success of his novels -- awards and all -- Dr Kellerman gave up his private practice but remains a Prof. at the med school.

Talk about art imitating life, multitasking and what have you!

The psychology, as expected, is serious and often disturbing and the characters convincingly drawn. The books have been major hits and deservedly so. For all murder-mystery aficionados, Kellerman’s novels featuring Alex and Milo are a must read; and the great thing is that there are a lot of them!

Happy reading.

Wednesday, November 4, 2020

Thrillers in real life_ the life and times of Warren Hastings

 

Sometimes life imitates art (consider a certain type of Indian wedding and those in Bollywood movies) while at other times art imitates life (consider War and Peace and the paintings of Vincent Van Gough.) It happens occasionally, however, that a life is so dramatic, so full of adventure, romance, violence , war and  intrigue that few writers would dare create a thriller in its image for fear of being laughed at for writing childish fantasy.

One such life of high drama was that of Warren Hastings. Orphaned at an early age and poor to boot, Warren was packed off at age seventeen  to serve the East India Company as a Writer (accounts clerk) in India instead of being sent up to Oxbridge where his scholarly and athletic prowess may have given his life a very different turn from the one it took.

School history books do, I seem to remember, mention Hastings briefly and in a very boring manner, as one of the many monsters who came East to trade and stayed to rule. The trick, however, as I  discovered by accident, is to read the life of Hastings as a thriller, presented by another imperialist, racist Sahib, who nonetheless had a remarkable command of the English language and a powerful, compelling style of writing --Thomas Babington Macaulay.

Macaulay’s essay on Hastings is more than 40000 words long and so qualifies as a book of sorts, for the purposes of this blog. It also, by the sheer quantum, intensity and variety of its dramatic content, qualifies as a remarkable thriller.

I could attempt to summarize the story, but summaries are dull things, while both, the events of Hastings life and their presentation by Macaulay, sparkle with energy, excitement and power. Hastings was no knight in shining armour and Macaulay’s attempts to both condemn and defend him are intriguing. One must remember that Macaulay was trained as a lawyer.

(A couplet of Akbar Allahabadi comes to mind here

Paida hua vakil to shaitan ne kaha

Lo aaj hum bhi sahib-e-aulad ho gaye

The poet was a sessions judge, by the way)

A few examples to illustrate Macaulay’s skill and power as commentator and essayist would not be out of order here.

 In setting the context for Hasting’s early life in India, TBM says,

“But at first English power came among them (Indians/Bengalis) unaccompanied by English morality. There was an interval between the time at which they became our subjects, and the time at which we began to reflect that we were bound to discharge towards them the duties of rulers. During that interval the business of a servant of the Company was simply to wring out of the natives a hundred or two hundred thousand pounds as speedily as possible, that he might return home before his constitution had suffered from the heat, to marry a peer's daughter, to buy rotten boroughs in Cornwall, and to give balls in St. James's Square.”

Historians may debate the ‘English morality’ that Macaulay talks about, but the greed is beautifully described!

The descriptions of Hasting’s measures to raise money -- ‘the shamefully bloody, mercenary, and lucrative subjugation of Rohilcund, paid for by Oude’, the unjust but brutally successful effort to ‘wring extra money out of the Rajah of Benares’ and the  equally successful steps to ‘terrorize, torment, and despoil the wealthy Begums of Oude’ is explained as follows:

‘The finances of his government were in an embarrassed state, and this embarrassment he was determined to relieve by some means, fair or foul. The principle which directed all his dealings with his neighbours is fully expressed by the old motto of one of the great predatory families of Teviotdale, "Thou shalt want ere I want." He seems to have laid it down, as a fundamental proposition which could not be disputed, that, when he had not as many lacs of rupees as the public service required, he was to take them from anybody who had. One thing, indeed, is to be said in excuse for him. The pressure applied to him by his employers at home, was such as only the highest virtue could have withstood, such as left him no choice except to commit great wrongs, or to resign his high post, and with that post all his hopes of fortune and distinction. The Directors, it is true, never enjoined or applauded any crime. Far from it. Whoever examines their letters written at that time, will find there many just and humane sentiments, many excellent precepts, in short, an admirable code of political ethics. But every exhortation is modified or nullified by a demand for money. "Govern leniently, and send more money; practise strict justice and moderation towards neighbouring powers, and send more money"-- this is, in truth, the sum of almost all the instructions that Hastings ever received from home. Now these instructions, being interpreted, mean simply, "Be the father and the oppressor of the people; be just and unjust, moderate and rapacious." The Directors dealt with India, as the Church, in the good old times, dealt with a heretic. They delivered the victim over to the executioners, with an earnest request that all possible tenderness might be shown.’

Hasting’s effective efforts to raise finance calls forth the following comment from the Essayist:

‘Whatever we may think of the morality of Hastings, it cannot be denied that the financial results of his policy did honour to his talents.’

 Macaulay’s concluding take on Hastings is a remarkable effort at having your cake and eating it too:

‘… in the two great elements of all social virtue, in respect for the rights of others, and in sympathy for the sufferings of others, he was deficient. His principles were somewhat lax. His heart was somewhat hard. But though we cannot with truth describe him either as a righteous or as a merciful ruler, we cannot regard without admiration the amplitude and fertility of his intellect, his rare talents for command, for administration, and for controversy,………’

Much has been said about Warren Hastings, but one dimension of his life is usually ignored -- the story of his courtship and marriage to the Baroness Imhoff, the wife of the impecunious Baron Imhoff, whom he met on his second voyage to India. It is a love story par excellence and Macaulay’s brief description of it is brilliant and heart-warming.

Whatever else he was -- brutal imperialist, 'murderer' of Nandkumar, knower of Persian and Arabic et al -- he was also a man capable of love.

Macaulay’s Essays are available for download at www.gutenberg.org and the essay on Hastings is in Critical and Historical essays Volume 1.

Happy reading