Thursday, April 14, 2022

Liberalism and its Discontents--- Francis Fukuyama

 


 Prof. Fukuyama’s latest little book (less than 200 pages) is, as always, both educative and thought- provoking. Clarity of thought and expression are rarely found together in works about political philosophy/ideology but Fukuyama manages both with consummate ease.

The author works towards defining an ideal by choosing and defining Liberalism, elaborating the justifications for this particular political point of view, its relationship with democracy, its excesses and the course corrections necessary to build a progressive and just society under its aegis.

The author argues that Liberalism is founded on the basic notions of human dignity, equality and autonomy which in turn require rights to be vested primarily in individuals, not in groups and be enforceable under laws in a justice system that is itself autonomous.

 This approach to politics emphasizes individual freedoms-- of speech, transactions, faith amongst many others. A focus on individual autonomy necessarily implies limitations of the powers of the state by law and enforcement of such constraints by institutions that protect that autonomy- courts, bureaucracy and media.

Liberalism so defined is justified on practical , moral and economic grounds. Practically, it is the best way of ensuring peaceful and progressive management of diversity; morally, the dignity of the individual human being is a fundamental human imperative and economically, liberalism has given the human race remarkable returns in terms of technological change, growth and development. At least, so goes the argument.

Liberalism and democracy are related but distinct. Democracy may be defined as ‘rule by the people’ as ‘institutionalized in free and fair multiparty elections’ based on universal adult suffrage. Liberal values and institutions reinforce democracy and an attack on these values is usually followed by one on democracy too-the spirit if not always the letter. Putin’s Russia is just one of several modern examples of this truism.

The ‘discontents’ with Liberalism arise due to unwarranted and undesirable extensions of the Liberal ideology. Particularly delightful, for a one who suffered neoclassical notions of economics being force-fed into one’s ignorant mind a long time ago, is Fukuyama’s critique of the free- market religion built on the foundations of ‘physics envy’( the compulsion to imitate the mathematical elegance of physics) and resulting in wildly unrealistic assumptions about economic behavior and slick models wholly inapplicable to real life.

Another threat to Liberal doctrine arises from Liberalism’s own creation-the technological revolution of the late 20th century- the Internet and all that it brought along with it. Not only does new tech empower authoritarian states but it has also concentrated undue power to control the dissemination of information in the hands of a few giant corporations. Since, in social media, there is no vetting, peer review or democratic deliberation every voice has equal weight and the dissemination of false and weaponized information is a major growth industry. Echo chambers are created and individuals are targeted  with information that feeds their personal predilections as displayed on social media. People thus bask in the reassuring comfort of information that reinforces their personal idiosyncrasies, oblivious of alternative points of view, validated data and the rest of the world around them. Information flows are controlled and manipulated and so are minds.

The problem with information technology giants and their power is real and clearly highlighted, but solutions do not appear to be readily available.

Fukuyama’s book defines an ideal and justifies it but there is no clear path defined to get to it, and their lies the rub. How does a society achieve the ideal from a very suboptimal real? If human beings are as greedy, power hungry, intolerant and violence prone as history has established, just how do we change it?

It is perhaps unfair to expect to find all answers in one slim book but at least the problem and the ideal are clearly defined by Prof Fukuyama. And that makes the book a very interesting read.

Happy reading

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment